MCA file review

Reviewing a Canadian MCA default file: evidence, gates, and next decisions

A Canadian MCA or future-receivables file should be reviewed as an evidence and decision problem before it is treated as a recovery assignment. The agreement label, claimed balance, or missed remittance does not by itself determine legal characterization, liability, or remedy.

Confirm the parties and transaction record

Identify the funder or purchaser, merchant legal entity, operating names, guarantors, broker or servicer, relevant processors, amendments, and the client authority supporting disclosure and recovery activity. Confirm that names and dates align across the agreement, statements, bank or processor records, and prior correspondence.

Rebuild the payment chronology

Document the purchase price, purchased amount, remittance mechanism, reconciliation terms, debits or splits, returned items, credits, fees, modifications, settlements, and the calculation supporting the current claim. Isolate any amount that remains disputed or unsupported.

Check the merchant's operating status

Establish whether the merchant remains active, has changed names or locations, sold operations, changed processors or accounts, entered insolvency proceedings, or ceased business. Use only lawful and authorized information sources, and distinguish verified facts from unconfirmed leads.

Choose the next documented decision

A responsible review ends with a defined decision: obtain missing records, correct the calculation, refresh information, begin authorized commercial contact, propose a structured resolution discussion, obtain legal advice, coordinate another regulated professional, pause, return, or close the file. No checklist can predict recovery or determine a remedy for a specific matter.

Confidential fit review

Bring the file that standard workflows could not move.

Request a recovery review